📣 Send us your press release
Site updates every 15 minutes
Retail

12 States Sue to Block Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Merger

A coalition of twelve states has filed a lawsuit seeking to block the $110 billion merger between Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Global. If the deal is delayed past September 30, incremental costs could amount to millions daily for Paramount.

14 July 2026
12 States Sue to Block Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Merger

Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Global are facing a legal challenge from twelve US states, including California, aiming to block their proposed $110 billion merger. The lawsuit, filed on Monday, argues that the transaction would significantly reduce competition in the theatrical film and cable television markets. The states have requested that the companies halt the closing of the deal until the judicial process concludes, threatening to seek a temporary restraining order if they refuse.

The merger agreement includes a provision where Paramount's cash offer of $31 per share increases by $0.25 for every 90-day period after September 30 if the merger's closing is delayed. These additional costs would accrue daily and be payable if the deal ultimately closes. In the event the transaction fails due to a lack of regulatory approval, Paramount would be obligated to pay Warner Bros. Discovery a termination fee of $7 billion.

Legal experts suggest the substantial termination fee might incentivize Paramount to pursue the merger despite regulatory hurdles rather than abandoning it. However, the ongoing legal scrutiny means that any further delays past the September deadline could indeed lead to Paramount incurring millions in additional daily costs. The structure of the agreement also indicates that both companies anticipated potential regulatory resistance.

Herbert Hovenkamp, an antitrust scholar at the University of Pennsylvania, commented that the termination fee primarily serves to keep Paramount committed to defending the merger. He anticipates that litigation is more probable than an outright termination, with potential outcomes including divestitures as part of a settlement, though no such discussions have been reported.

Original source: inc.com