📣 Send us your press release
Site updates every 15 minutes
Professional Services

Leadership Consultant Identifies Three Common Avoided Conversations

A leadership consultant outlines three prevalent workplace conversations that often go undiscussed, leading to eroded energy and trust. Avoiding these critical dialogues carries significant costs for organizations.

2 July 2026
Leadership Consultant Identifies Three Common Avoided Conversations

Leadership consultant and author, [Consultant's Name - if available, otherwise omit], has identified three common types of workplace conversations that leaders frequently avoid, often to the detriment of their organizations. These unproductive silences, according to the consultant, represent missed opportunities for growth and can lead to significant organizational drag.

The core issue, as described, is not the silence itself but what it signifies: an avoided conversation. These silences can manifest as awkward pauses in meetings or a rapid shift in topic, indicating an underlying issue that requires attention. The three categories of avoided conversations are:

  1. The Elephant: This refers to a significant but unaddressed issue that everyone in the room is aware of but nobody initiates discussion about. Examples include a consistently underperforming employee, a strategy that is no longer viable, or a universally acknowledged problem. Energy is wasted by the team working around the issue instead of resolving it.

  2. The Hangover: This category encompasses the lingering impact of past events, such as a poorly handled reorganization or a past leadership crisis, that continue to influence present-day behavior and attitudes. The focus should be on acknowledging the history and committing to a different approach rather than solely addressing current behaviors.

  3. The Cupboard Under the Stairs: This represents conversations that have been implicitly ruled out, where a topic has become taboo. It often involves sensitive issues like serious individual mistakes or organizational failures that are deemed too difficult or risky to address, leading to collective avoidance.

The long-term cost of avoiding these conversations is substantial, impacting team morale, productivity, and trust. The consultant emphasizes that facing these discussions directly, even when uncomfortable, is essential for organizational health. The key is not necessarily eloquence but the willingness to speak honestly and plainly, which can ultimately free up energy and rebuild trust within teams.

Original source: fastcompany.com