Meta, Google, and TikTok challenge California social media law in federal court

Meta, Google, and TikTok have initiated legal action against the state of California, challenging Assembly Bill 1709, which is set to take effect on January 1, 2027. The law mandates that social media platforms disable personalized algorithmic feeds and autoplay features for users under 16, prohibiting these functions even with parental consent.

The companies argue the legislation violates their First Amendment rights by interfering with their editorial discretion to curate and display online content. In their filings, Google, Meta, and TikTok contend that the state is overstepping its authority and that these algorithmic tools are protected expressions. They also cite Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, arguing that content moderation and recommendation processes are protected publishing activities.

Industry representatives emphasize that platforms already provide tools for parental supervision, such as time limits and content filters. Google noted that removing personalized recommendations could potentially increase, rather than decrease, a minor's exposure to inappropriate content. TikTok, currently challenging similar state regulations, argues that the law fails to establish a compelling government interest that justifies such broad restrictions.

Privacy advocates, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, have raised concerns that the law’s enforcement could inadvertently compromise user privacy. They argue that verifying the ages of all users to comply with these restrictions would require platforms to collect extensive personal data, undermining the ability of both minors and adults to remain anonymous online.